Thursday, March 14, 2024

My not so Dutch great-grandfather part 2

So perhaps I'm being a little bit unfair to the Dutch side of my Denhof line, as there is more Dutch than German.  For me, it really boils down to growing up believing they were 100% Dutch and then finding out that it's just not true.  

On Nick Denhof's father's side I've shown that his father's Denhof line goes back to Germany.  The records I find for his paternal grandfather's mother's family all point to the Netherlands.  Switching over to his maternal grandmother (Lammina van Heuvelen), her father's records all point to Großwolde, Leer, Lower Saxony, Germany, using the name Höveling (Robert didn't find available records for that area so it's unconfirmed).  Her mother's family also all point to the Netherlands.  

Switching over to his mother's side:  I wrote about Nick's mother Margaret and wrote a follow-up post about the DNA test that proved Margaret's father (as her birth record shows she was born out of wedlock).  As you can probably guess, we're going back to Germany with at least one of these families, although today I'm going to write about the Dutch and American records I have for her parents.  


Her father was born Bernardus Henderikus Kock (Americanized to Bernard Cook), born 2 Nov 1830 at Uithuizen, Netherlands.   

In the year 1830, the 2nd of November, at 3 o'clock in the afternoon, appeared for me, Derk Nanninga, Civil Official of Uithuizen, Hendrikus Kock, 40 years old, profession weaver, who reports to me that a child of the male gender is born, here, in the house on number 183, today in the early morning at 3 o'clock from him, declarant, and Gesina Jans Schreuder, his wife. He stated that he wanted to give this child the first name Bernardus.
Whose statement has been made, in the presence of Cornelis Jiltes Keiser, 70 years old, without profession, Roelf Sleumer, 37 years old, profession carpenter, both living here, being neighbors and not related to the declarant. After reading aloud, this document was signed by them and me, with the exception of the first witness, who stated that he could not write.




Her mother was born Johanna Kuis 21 Nov 1834 in the neighboring city of Uithuizeermeeden.

In the year 1834, the 22nd of November, at 4 o'clock in the afternoon, appeared for me, Albert Pieters Bouma, Mayor, Civil Registry Official of the municipality of Uithuistermeeden (nowadays Uithuizermeeden, Province of Groningen), Bernardus Kuis, 43 years old, profession weaver, living in Uithuistermeeden, who has introduced to us, a child of the female gender, born on November 21, 1834, at night at 1 am, from him, declarant and Grietje Jans Graftema, in the house at Number 93, in the village of Uithuizermeeden.
To which he has stated that he wants to give the first name of Johanna.This statement was made up in the presence of Bene Hindriks Baar, 38 years old, profession day laborer, and Jan Harms Deilen, 34 years old, profession weaver, both living in Uithuizermeeden.
This is how this document was drawn up, which after reading aloud, was signed by the declarant, together with the witnesses and us, on the day, month and year as mentioned above.








Bernardus and Johanna married 2 Nov 1859 at Uithuizen, making 2 of their children "legitimate".  

On November 2, 1859, appeared for us, Civil Registry in Uithuizen, District of Appingedam, Province of Groningen, in the town hall, to enter into a marriage;
Bernardus Kock, 28 years old, profession day laborer, living in Uithuizen, born in Uithuizen, Municipality Uithuizen, son of the late Hendrikus Kock, deceased in Uithuizen and Gesina Jans Schreuder, profession day laborer, living in Uithuizen, declarant has fulfilled his obligation to the national militia, according to the certificate attached to this.
Johanna Kuis, 24 years old, without profession, living in Uithuizen, born in Uithuistermeeden, municipality Uithuistermeeden, adult-daughter of Bernardus Kuis, without profession, living in Uithuizen and the late Grietje Jans Graftema, died in Uithuistermeeden.The two announcements have taken place here, without objections, on the 16th and the 23st of October 1859.  
And they have submitted to us, their birth certificates, the death certificate of the father of the groom, the death certificate of the mother of the bride, and a written consent/permit from the colonel commanding the second fortress artillery regiment. Furthermore, the fiancés told us, to acknowledge these two children, the first named Hendrik, born in Uithuizen on December 28, 1857, and the second named Margritha, born in Uithuizen on August 20, 1859, whose birth certificates are hereby submitted. The mother of the groom and the father of the bride, hereby present, declare to us, that they agree to this marriage.  After which we have publicly asked them whether they will take one another as spouses and will faithfully fulfill all obligations, that are linked by law, to the marriage, what they explicitly answered with YES, have we, in the name of law, pronounced that they are now married to each other, as husband and wife.  In the presence of Andreas Bulthuis, 62 years old, profession Inn keeper, living in Uithuizen, Willem Veldhuizen, 50 years old, profession secretary, living in Uithuizen, Roelf Pieters Hoff, 44 years old, by profession policeman, living in Uithuizen, and of Hendrik Bulthuis, 25 years old, baker's assistent by profession, living in Uithuizen.  And from this, we made up this document which, after reading aloud, is signed by the declarant, the bride, the mother of the groom, the father of the bride, the witnesses and us. The groom declared not to be able to sign the document because he has never learned how to write.

I don't know when Bernardus and Johanna came to America.  The first census record they're in is from 1 Jun 1870 in the 1st ward of Grand Rapids, Kent County Michigan.  On 10 Jun 1880 they're living in Chester Township, Ottawa County Michigan.  

1870 living with Bernardus' brother Henry's family.  Gesiena was Nick's godmother

1880 living next door to Nick's parents Nick and Margaret.  Their son Ben is incorrectly listed as a daughter.  

Bernardus passed away of heart disease 20 Nov 1891 at Grand Rapids.  I don't know if the family moved back to Grand Rapids, but he was buried at St. Andrews Catholic Cemetery. 

 
Johanna was living with Nick and Margaret in the 1900 census of Chester Township.  They lived next door to Ida Cook Vander Laan, niece of Bernardus. 


Johanna passed away 3 Oct 1907 at Chester Township, allegedly of epilepsy.  She's laid to rest near her daughter Margaret.  

You'll notice that both Bernardus and Johanna's death records indicate parents from the Netherlands.  As you probably guessed, that's only partially correct.  More on that in my next post.  

The Kock/Cook/Kuis lines have frustrated me greatly due to the lack of photos.  If you're reading this and have any photos, please let me know.  






Wednesday, March 13, 2024

My not so Dutch great-grandfather - part 1

Five years ago I wrote a blog about my great-grandpa Nicholas (Nick) Denhof's father Nicolaas Denhof.  I mentioned that Nick was proud of his Dutch heritage but that his grandfathers listed Germany as their place of birth on some of their records (I doubt he ever knew that).  Having not been able to verify the German with actual records I included what was listed on the records, but I've always kind of discounted it, especially since I couldn't find the alleged cities listed anywhere.  

I have mentioned in multiple posts working with Robert Albert Jr. of California for several of my German lines (he's done some amazing work for me and broken down several brick walls).  I decided to work on the Denhof line some more and reached out to him to see if he would be able to find anything.  I (again) couldn't have been happier with the results.  I titled this post "part 1" because I couldn't possibly squeeze everything he found into one post.  There is so much German in my grandma's (Nick's daughter) ancestry, that I hesitate to even claim her "Dutchness".  

Let's start with the direct Denhof line.  I've been able to establish with actual records that Nicolaas Denhof was born 30 Apr 1854 at Uithuizen, Groningen, Netherlands to Jacobus Jacobs Denhof and Lammina van Heuvelen.  I briefly mentioned them in the above blog link.  Jacobus was born 17 Apr 1819 to Jacob Klaasens Denhof and Elisabeth Hendricks Sprik.  He married Lammina 24 Apr 1841 at Kantens, Groningen Netherlands, and died at Uithuizen 12 Feb 1896.  So we have Nick's grandpa Denhof completely Dutch.  What about his great-grandpa Denhof?

Jacob Klaasens Denhof was found in the Dutch records when he married Elisabeth 5 Jun 1812 at Uithuizen, and when he died at Kantens 29 Sep 1840.  So his birth?  We're back to the 1700s and birth records aren't available in the Netherlands but his marriage record lists his birth at Uithuizen 8 Feb 1772 at Uithuizen.  Then why does his death record list birth at "Waan Duitsland"?  I searched high and low for "Waan" and never found anything.  He listed his parents as Klaas Jacobs and Aaltje Stevens when he married Elisabeth and I had a bit of information about them in my tree as well.  

I hired a researcher in the Netherlands in the late 1990s (before the records were so readily available online) and they had Klaas' death 4 Jan 1823 at Uithuizen (having been born at Zandeweer, Netherlands).  His wife was listed as Hindrikje Harms, and that marriage record was also found.  As I paid a reputable researcher in the Netherlands I took this information as gospel, added it to my tree, and moved on.  

When Robert and I started discussing this Robert found a possible city in Germany called "Wahn" (which from this post doesn't exist anymore).  Of course a possible city doesn't mean anything without records.  Robert hunted down the marriage bann for Jacobus and Elisabeth and noted if you go and look at the MARRIAGE BANN record from 1812 for Denhof/Sprik, you will see that it states that his father is Klaas Jacobs, and he is living in Werlte, a town near Sögel in Germany, and that his wife Aaltje Stevens is deceased by 1812. Will keep you posted. I am hoping to find some more clues, and fyi, the Werlte parish has lots of folks from Sögel and Wahn and area listed in that church, so I may have to expand catholic church searches in this area. Fortunately they list when catholic churches were built over time, so for instance on the Sögel main page it tells me that Wahn got a catholic church in 1869. Werlte is an oldie that goes back to the 1600's too.

So now we have a likely town, we just need records to prove it's correct.  Given that I already had a death record for Klaas Jacobs I was finding it odd that Klaas was born in the Netherlands, moved to Germany and had a family, lost his wife and moved back to the same area of the Netherlands and remarried.  We're not talking a simple road trip in the late 1700s - it wasn't making sense to me.  Then Robert found the actual birth record:

BIRTH1772JacobKlaasensSögelCathChurchPg33of66

Even if I'd have had access to these records I'd have never found this one as I can't read it without it being pointed out to me but there it was: I went back and just started to go through the entire year of 1772, when I got to the SEVENTH of OCTOBER I found it. Jacob Klassens and his wife Adelheid Steffens are the parents, and Joannes Steffens and Catharina Nordberg are the witnesses. You will see on the entry above his, that person's record is the 30th of a month. Right below you see 8ber. That is Acht ober, or October. They use this abbreviation frequently for 7ber, 8ber, 9ber, 10ber, for Sept, Oct, Nov, Dec. It was also on the next to last page of the records of births for that year, so no clue as to how they got February out of it, and the day is clearly listed as the 7th. I'm just glad it was there.

MAR1771JacobsSteffensSögelCatholicChurchPg32of63


DEATH1823NicolausJacobsWerlteCatholicChurchPg41of63


Nicolaus Jacobs and Adelheid Steffens married 26 Nov 1771 at Sögel.  He can't find a death record for Adelheid but he did find that Nicolaus remarried to a Gesina Kuper/Cuper 18 Nov 1778, also at Sögel.  That remarriage was key to proving the death record was the correct subject.  

Nicolaus Jacobs died at Bockholte 4 Jan 1823 and was buried 7 Jan 1823 at Wertle, the town his son listed him living in in 1812.  His death is the bottom listing at age 96 (which is ironic as my grandmother, his 3rd great granddaughter is currently 96).  The name of his 2nd wife is clearly listed there, proving it's him.  Does anything strike you odd about the death record?  This "Klaas Jacobs" (actually Nicolaus Jacobs) ALSO DIED 4 Jan 1823???  What are the chances that my Dutch researcher got this wrong so many years ago but had the right death date?  Seems implausible to me but having been witness to it, I can't deny that it happened.  When I noticed the death date I mentioned it to Robert (I was not questioning him as we'd discussed this evidence and I was convinced he's correct).  I re-sent him the Dutch Klaas Jacobs death record and he sent the following: 

Thanks for sending that. Of course I had seen the record before and looked at it, just never realized that the two folks had the same date of death and for all intents and purposes the same name as well. The difference between the 2 records is that nothing on this record is obviously connected to your ancestor. The witnesses submitting the information 2 months after that man died in the Netherlands, or the wife, etc. etc. Your original tree had the date and the wife added, but nothing on it really links it to your tree other than the name.

On the German records, as you know we have:
1- place of birth (Wahn) in Germany of his son which we have from the Netherlands docs
2- son's marriage bann where it says the very town that his father was living in 1812
3- the marriage of the father to Adhelheid Steffens and children born to them in Sogel
4- the second marriage of his father and children born in Werlte
5- the death record for the father listing his second wife's name
6- the death record for the father.

If I had seen in that first record anything at all that really linked him to your tree, I would maybe have paused even longer, but there is just so much evidence that the latter is the correct one for sure and this is just one of those freaky coincidences.

So my great-grandpa Denhof's dad was Dutch, and his grandpa Denhof was Dutch, but the great-grandfather and likely way beyond has now been confirmed as German.  That's only one of Nick's ancestors - was Robert able to prove more?  Stay tuned.......

As an aside - my youngest was named Jacob Nicholas (both of my dad's grandfathers were named Nicholas).  Robert finding that "Klaas Jacobs" was actually Nicolaus Jacobs means that the name Nicholas or Jacob goes straight back in this line until at least about 1727:  Nicholas Paul>Nicolaas>Jacobus Jacobs>Jacob Klaasens>Nicolaus Jacobs.  It wasn't deliberate but I think it's pretty neat.   

Tuesday, March 12, 2024

It's been almost 10 years (and only 74 blog posts)

 My wife asked me the other day "why don't you blog anymore"?  She thinks I'm a good writer and knows I enjoyed doing it.  I don't have a good answer other than I guess I always find something else to do (and it's not reading the growing book collection I'm building when thrifting, much to her chagrin).  I keep renewing my ancestry.com membership because they keep giving me a deal.  With my job it's nice to have something "mindless" to do at night and quite frankly those little 'shaky leafs' are pretty mindless.  You do have to pay attention to them to make sure they're the correct record, and often there are transcription errors but for the most part, it's click-compare-add-done.  So much so that I've currently got 430,612 of those records attached to people in my tree.  You read that right - I've matched a little short of a half million records to people in my tree.  My order history at Ancestry shows my first subscription 7/21/2012.  The Google tells me there have been 4,252 days since then meaning I'm averaging 101 records/day.  Doing the math on that shocks me as I've taken a few significant breaks during this time and I don't have time to work on it daily.  

In my first post I posted that I had 44,993 people in my tree.  Fast forward to today and it's 136,222 (see, I am actually doing something with the shaky leafs)!  One thing that's helped is that most of my family stayed in Michigan and the Library of Michigan now has a ton of newspapers available online (do you know how many people you can add to your tree when you're able to look up birth and marriage announcements and obituaries while sitting on your couch?).  In the past I had to drive downtown, usually with a list of items to find, then find what microfilm I wanted to search (hoping the record was indexed in their books) and then search for the page.  Now?  I put a name in and hit search and it brings the pages to me in seconds.  In another early post I posted a list of links that I used back then.  Looking that list over about half of them are still valid (some have just changed urls, which seems silly to me).  I'd add newspapers.com and the aforementioned Library of Michigan site.  Seriously, if you live in Michigan and are interested in genealogy (or history in general) sign up for a library card (another thing you can do from your couch) and get to searching - it's FREE!

The one thing I wrote back then that I absolutely disagree with now is use of the www.familysearch.org family tree.  Their idea is wonderful - have people collaborate on one world tree.  Unfortunately there are so many people that are so careless that the information is almost useless.  I have tried to fix errors in "my part" of the tree and I have given up.  I regret giving that recommendation, but one regret isn't bad at all.

Why am I posting this tonight?  I think it's neat to look back and see how things have changed.  I also think I'm going to try to heed her advice and try some blogging again.  I'm a tad bored with what I've been doing in my tree and I enjoy telling the stories about the people and how information came together.  Who knows if anyone will read it or how long I'll stick with it but I'll give it another try.  Wish me luck!